#Maxpedion falcon 3 vs condor 2 plus

By looking at the photo above and seeing that the Condor II is actually shorter, it may lead you to believe that it holds a lot less here than the Falcon II. Now, you may be wondering what the actual differences are between the Falcon and the Condor. Comparison of the Maxpedition Falcon II vs Condor II This means that your gear is super compressible, especially if youвЂ™re going to only fill it half way. The Falcon II and Condor II have compression straps at the top and bottom of the sides, and also in the front. If you fill up your backpack completely, it will get heavy but the extra padding on the shoulder straps makes it ultra comfortable. You can fit a laptop into the main compartment, along with some textbooks and your clothing. There are zippered pockets where you can separate your smaller items. Inside of the large compartments are some separators for your gear.

They both have 4 large compartments one is the main compartment, another sits in the middle, and the other two are at the top and bottom of the front of the backpack. Having these large water reservoirs come in very handy throughout the day, especially on a hot day. They both hold water reservoirs that you can use to hydrate yourself without needing to reach for a water bottle every time you want to take a swig.

#Maxpedion falcon 3 vs condor 2 plus

They come with very thick materials and are triple coated for water resistance, plus an extra coating of Teflon for abrasion resistance. But overall, these are some of the most durable backpacks on the market. The durability of these backpacks is similar but with a slight difference that we will talk about later. Both the Condor II and the Falcon II have these PALS attachments on the shoulder straps on the front of the backpack. TheyвЂ™re also very good at adding plenty of PALS webbing attachments so that you can use MOLLE or ALICE pouches and actually increase the total volume capacity. Maxpedition has a reputation for making shorter bags of medium size that have plenty of space in their main compartment. Yes, there is a good bit of marketing hype associated with Maxpedition gear, but it's hype backed up by clearly superior products.Buy on Amazon What makes the Falcon II and Condor II similar Better sewn using heavier materials and exhibiting better design. Now, Condor gear is not bad - in fact some of the stuff I've looked at has been pretty well put together, but the Maxpedition products are clearly better. If you turn a Maxpedition product and a similar Condor product inside out you'll see the difference.

Much of the cost built into the offerings from these fine companies is labor cost.) (Here's a hint - we all marvel at the cost of products from Frost River and Duluth.

Since most of their production is done in Taiwan I can't imagine what their products would cost if they were made in the US and the cost of US labor was built into these products. Maxpedition employs some extremely talented sewing machine operators and clearly has some rigid QC in-place. Much of what you pay for with Maxpedition is the quality of the construction. For nylon tactical gear the only other civilian manufacturer I've seen that matches Maxpedition quality is Camelbak. Maxpedition construction techniques are top-tier, right up there with MILSPEC construction done by experienced DoD field equipment contractors like Specialty Defense Systems.